Maiden.bet

Tennis predictions, June 10, 2026: Bublik vs. Struff, Mcnally vs. Navarro

By The Maiden Desk · June 10, 2026

Every number below was fixed before the match and graded against the official result.

Share card

11 matches are on Wednesday's card across 3 events, and we have a pick for every one of them. The headline act: Alexander Bublik against Jan Lennard Struff in the round of 16. Our calls: Bublik over Struff, Mcnally over Navarro, Anisimova over Siegemund, Vandewinkel over Bartunkova, Majchrzak over Virtanen, Hurkacz over Fucsovics, and 5 more.

June 9, 2026 results: 12-6 how our picks graded, match by match.

Alexander Bublik vs. Jan Lennard Struff

✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Alexander Bublik at 66% before the match, and Alexander Bublik won 7-6 3-6 6-2.

Pick: Bublik

Win probability: 66% Bublik

Wednesday's Stuttgart round of 16 pits Alexander Bublik against Jan Lennard Struff on grass. Alexander Bublik is searching for form, having lost 2 in a row (4 of the last 10). Jan Lennard Struff has won 5 of the last 10.

The ledger favors Jan Lennard Struff, 4-3 across their 7 meetings with Alexander Bublik. On grass specifically it reads 1-0 Bublik — worth more than the overall number this week.

Alexander Bublik simply rates much higher on grass, and our number follows from it. Struff comes in off a compressed schedule. Expect resistance, but the match-level math tilts clearly toward Bublik.

Caty Mcnally vs. Emma Navarro

✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 62% on Caty Mcnally, who won 4-6 6-0 6-4.

Pick: Mcnally

Win probability: 62% Mcnally

Wednesday's Hertogenbosch round of 32 pits Caty Mcnally against Emma Navarro on grass. Caty Mcnally comes in at 6 wins from the last ten. Emma Navarro is 6-4 across recent matches.

Emma Navarro has had the better of this rivalry, winning 2 of 2 against Caty Mcnally.

The underlying stats are tight across the board — this is a matchup decided by a handful of points. Expect resistance, but the match-level math tilts clearly toward Mcnally.

Amanda Anisimova vs. Laura Siegemund

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Amanda Anisimova was our 61% pick, and won 6-1 6-3.

Pick: Anisimova

Win probability: 61% Anisimova

Amanda Anisimova and Laura Siegemund meet in the round of 16 at London on Wednesday. Amanda Anisimova comes in at 6 wins from the last ten. Laura Siegemund has won 5 of the last 10.

The two have never played — a first meeting always adds a layer of uncertainty the numbers can't fully capture.

Amanda Anisimova is clearly higher-rated on grass — our number puts Anisimova around 61%. Siegemund comes in off a compressed schedule. Expect resistance, but the match-level math tilts clearly toward Anisimova.

Hanne Vandewinkel vs. Nikola Bartunkova

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Hanne Vandewinkel was our 54% pick, and won 4-6 7-6 7-5.

Pick: Vandewinkel

Win probability: 54% Vandewinkel

A spot in the next round is at stake on Wednesday, when Hanne Vandewinkel goes up against Nikola Bartunkova in the Hertogenbosch round of 32. Hanne Vandewinkel is 4-6 across recent matches. Nikola Bartunkova is 7-3 across recent matches.

There is no history here: this is their first tour-level meeting.

On paper it's close: comparable ratings, comparable serve numbers, small margins everywhere. This one is close to a coin flip, and the lean toward Vandewinkel is exactly that — a lean.

Kamil Majchrzak vs. Otto Virtanen

✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Kamil Majchrzak at 85% before the match, and Kamil Majchrzak won 6-7 6-4 7-6.

Pick: Majchrzak

Win probability: 85% Majchrzak

A spot in the next round is at stake on Wednesday, when Kamil Majchrzak goes up against Otto Virtanen in the Hertogenbosch round of 32. Kamil Majchrzak comes in at 5 wins from the last ten. Otto Virtanen is 5-5 across recent matches.

This is the first career meeting between the two, which means no head-to-head baggage on either side of the net.

The underlying stats are tight across the board — this is a matchup decided by a handful of points. Virtanen needs several things to break right at once; the percentages say they usually don't.

Hubert Hurkacz vs. Marton Fucsovics

✗ Pick wrongA miss: Hubert Hurkacz at 84% lost to Marton Fucsovics (3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4)).

Pick: Hurkacz

Win probability: 84% Hurkacz

A spot in the next round is at stake on Wednesday, when Hubert Hurkacz goes up against Marton Fucsovics in the Hertogenbosch round of 32. Hubert Hurkacz has won 4 of the last 10. Marton Fucsovics is searching for form, having lost 4 in a row (4 of the last 10).

Marton Fucsovics leads the head-to-head 2-0, and history has a way of mattering in matchups like this one. On grass specifically it reads 1-0 Fucsovics — worth more than the overall number this week.

Hold strength tells the story — 75.9% versus 70.9% on first-serve points in Hurkacz's favor. Fucsovics needs several things to break right at once; the percentages say they usually don't.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Tallon Griekspoor

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Tallon Griekspoor was our 67% pick, and won 6-2 6-7 6-4.

Pick: Griekspoor

Win probability: 67% Griekspoor

Wednesday's Hertogenbosch round of 32 pits Botic Van De Zandschulp against Tallon Griekspoor on grass. Tallon Griekspoor limps in on a 3-match losing skid, just 3 wins in 10. Botic Van De Zandschulp is 6-4 across recent matches.

The ledger favors Tallon Griekspoor, 2-1 across their 3 meetings with Botic Van De Zandschulp.

There's a wide gap in our ratings on grass, and our number follows from it. The edge belongs to Griekspoor — real, but not the kind you take for granted at this level.

Anastasia Potapova vs. Suzan Lamens

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Anastasia Potapova was our 68% pick, and won 6-7 6-4 6-4.

Pick: Potapova

Win probability: 68% Potapova

A spot in the next round is at stake on Wednesday, when Anastasia Potapova goes up against Suzan Lamens in the Hertogenbosch round of 32. Anastasia Potapova has won 8 of the last 10. Suzan Lamens limps in on a 6-match losing skid, just 2 wins in 10.

Anastasia Potapova has had the better of this rivalry, winning 1 of 1 against Suzan Lamens.

On paper it's close: comparable ratings, comparable serve numbers, small margins everywhere. Expect resistance, but the match-level math tilts clearly toward Potapova.

James Mccabe vs. Zizou Bergs

✗ Pick wrongWe got this one wrong. Our final number was 73% on Zizou Bergs; James Mccabe won 6-7 6-2 7-6.

Pick: Bergs

Win probability: 73% Bergs

James Mccabe and Zizou Bergs meet in the round of 32 at Hertogenbosch on Wednesday. Zizou Bergs is searching for form, having lost 3 in a row (4 of the last 10). James Mccabe has won 2 of the last 10.

There is no history here: this is their first tour-level meeting.

Zizou Bergs simply rates much higher on grass, and our number follows from it. Anything other than a Bergs win would rank among the bigger surprises of the week.

Lois Boisson vs. Solana Sierra

✗ Pick wrongWe got this one wrong. Our final number was 71% on Lois Boisson; Solana Sierra won 6-4 5-7 6-3.

Pick: Boisson

Win probability: 71% Boisson

Lois Boisson and Solana Sierra meet in the round of 32 at Hertogenbosch on Wednesday. Lois Boisson comes in at 4 wins from the last ten. Solana Sierra brings a 3-match winning streak into this one, 8-2 across the last ten.

This is the first career meeting between the two, which means no head-to-head baggage on either side of the net.

The serve is where this match separates: Boisson has been winning 68.5% of first-serve points to Sierra's 61.3%, and on grass that gap compounds fast. The edge belongs to Boisson — real, but not the kind you take for granted at this level.

Thijs Boogaard vs. Yibing Wu

✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 61% on Thijs Boogaard, who won 6-3 2-6 6-4.

Pick: Boogaard

Win probability: 61% Boogaard

Wednesday's Hertogenbosch round of 32 pits Thijs Boogaard against Yibing Wu on grass. Thijs Boogaard has dropped 3 straight and sits at 0-10 over the last ten. Yibing Wu is 5-5 across recent matches.

The two have never played — a first meeting always adds a layer of uncertainty the numbers can't fully capture.

Boogaard's 71.4% behind the first serve (against 68.3% for Wu) means break chances should be scarce in one direction. Boogaard should have enough here, though Wu has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.

Get the free ebook + tomorrow's picks

Sign up for the daily desk email and our nine-chapter beginner's guide to trading sports prediction markets comes free as a PDF. One email a day with the day's free picks in full, unsubscribe anytime.

Updated Jul 3, 2026, 8:57 PM UTC. Picks are frozen before first serve and graded on the track record page — this page is never edited after the fact.