✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 88% on Carlos Alcaraz, who won 4-6 6-0 6-3 6-2.
Pick: Alcaraz
Win probability: 88% Alcaraz · Market: -722 · We call it in 3 sets (60%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (55%)
Carlos Alcaraz and Jaime Faria meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Carlos Alcaraz has won 7 of the last 10. Jaime Faria has won 6 of the last 10.
Carlos Alcaraz is clearly higher-rated on hard — our number puts Alcaraz around 88%. Anything other than a Alcaraz win would rank among the bigger surprises of the week.
✗ Pick wrongA miss: Lorenzo Musetti at 86% lost to Dane Sweeny (3-6 6-1 6-2 6-2).
Pick: Musetti
Win probability: 86% Musetti · Market: -1176 · We call it in 3 sets (62%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (56%)
A spot in the next round is at stake on Thursday, when Dane Sweeny goes up against Lorenzo Musetti in the US Open round of 64. Lorenzo Musetti comes in at 7 wins from the last ten. Dane Sweeny has won 4 of the last 10.
The serve is where this match separates: Musetti has been winning 69.6% of first-serve points to Sweeny's 66%, and on hard that gap compounds fast. Anything other than a Musetti win would rank among the bigger surprises of the week.
✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Alexander Blockx was our 77% pick, and won 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Pick: Blockx
Win probability: 77% Blockx · Market: -418 · We call it in 4+ sets (67%) · single likeliest score 3-1 (31%)
Alexander Blockx and Marco Trungelliti meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Alexander Blockx comes in at 5 wins from the last ten. Marco Trungelliti comes in at 4 wins from the last ten.
Hold strength tells the story — 74.5% versus 67.3% on first-serve points in Blockx's favor. Trungelliti needs several things to break right at once; the percentages say they usually don't.
✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Taylor Fritz at 77% before the match, and Taylor Fritz won 6-0 6-1 6-1.
Pick: Fritz
Win probability: 77% Fritz · Market: -649 · We call it in 4+ sets (50%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (43%)
A spot in the next round is at stake on Thursday, when Mattia Bellucci goes up against Taylor Fritz in the US Open round of 64. Taylor Fritz has won 8 of the last 10. Mattia Bellucci comes in at 4 wins from the last ten.
This is the first career meeting between the two, which means no head-to-head baggage on either side of the net.
The serve is where this match separates: Fritz has been winning 74.6% of first-serve points to Bellucci's 71.3%, and on hard that gap compounds fast. Anything other than a Fritz win would rank among the bigger surprises of the week.
✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 71% on Flavio Cobolli, who won 3-6 6-3 6-4 7-5.
Pick: Cobolli
Win probability: 71% Cobolli · Market: -421 · We call it in 3 sets (51%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (38%)
Flavio Cobolli and Tristan Schoolkate meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Flavio Cobolli has won 6 of the last 10. Tristan Schoolkate has won 5 of the last 10.
Flavio Cobolli is clearly higher-rated on hard — our number puts Cobolli around 71%. Cobolli should have enough here, though Schoolkate has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.
✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Jakub Mensik was our 70% pick, and won 6-3 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Pick: Mensik
Win probability: 70% Mensik · Market: -575 · We call it in 4+ sets (55%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (34%)
Jakub Mensik and Jurij Rodionov meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Jakub Mensik is 6-4 across recent matches. Jurij Rodionov is 4-6 across recent matches.
Hold strength tells the story — 76.7% versus 70.1% on first-serve points in Mensik's favor. The edge belongs to Mensik — real, but not the kind you take for granted at this level.
✗ Pick wrongMissed it. We had Felix Auger Aliassime at 69%, but Karen Khachanov won 6-7 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Pick: Aliassime
Win probability: 69% Aliassime · Market: -235 · We call it in 4+ sets (56%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (36%)
Felix Auger Aliassime and Karen Khachanov meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Felix Auger Aliassime comes in at 7 wins from the last ten. Karen Khachanov has won 4 of the last 10.
The serve is where this match separates: Aliassime has been winning 75.5% of first-serve points to Khachanov's 72%, and on hard that gap compounds fast. Aliassime should have enough here, though Khachanov has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.
✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 68% on Learner Tien, who won 6-3 6-4 6-3.
Pick: Tien
Win probability: 68% Tien · Market: -365 · We call it in 4+ sets (62%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (29%)
Thursday's US Open round of 64 pits Gael Monfils against Learner Tien on hard. Learner Tien comes in at 6 wins from the last ten. Gael Monfils has dropped 2 straight and sits at 4-6 over the last ten.
Learner Tien simply rates much higher on hard, and our number follows from it. Tien should have enough here, though Monfils has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.
✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Francisco Cerundolo at 64% before the match, and Francisco Cerundolo won 5-7 7-5 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Pick: Cerundolo
Win probability: 64% Cerundolo · Market: -160 · We call it in 4+ sets (58%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (29%)
A spot in the next round is at stake on Thursday, when Francisco Cerundolo goes up against Jan Lennard Struff in the US Open round of 64. Francisco Cerundolo is 6-4 across recent matches. Jan Lennard Struff has won 6 of the last 10.
Francisco Cerundolo simply rates much higher on hard, and our number follows from it. Cerundolo should have enough here, though Struff has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.
✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Alejandro Tabilo was our 63% pick, and won 2-6 7-6 7-6 6-2.
Pick: Tabilo
Win probability: 63% Tabilo · Market: -134 · We call it in 4+ sets (60%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (28%)
Alejandro Tabilo and Alexei Popyrin meet in the round of 64 at US Open on Thursday. Alejandro Tabilo comes in at 5 wins from the last ten. Alexei Popyrin has won 4 of the last 10.
Alejandro Tabilo simply rates much higher on hard, and our number follows from it. Expect resistance, but the match-level math tilts clearly toward Tabilo.
✓ Pick rightThis one lands on the correct side of the ledger: 58% on Luciano Darderi, who won 6-3 6-7 6-4 6-4.
Pick: Darderi
Win probability: 58% Darderi · Market: -136 · We call it in 4+ sets (61%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (24%)
Thursday's US Open round of 64 pits Dalibor Svrcina against Luciano Darderi on hard. Luciano Darderi has won 6 of the last 10. Dalibor Svrcina comes in at 4 wins from the last ten.
Hold strength tells the story — 70.2% versus 63.1% on first-serve points in Darderi's favor. This one is close to a coin flip, and the lean toward Darderi is exactly that — a lean.
✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Zizou Bergs at 66% before the match, and Zizou Bergs won 7-5 1-6 6-2 7-6.
Pick: Bergs
Win probability: 66% Bergs · Market: -218 · We call it in 4+ sets (59%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (29%)
Thursday's US Open round of 64 pits Jesper De Jong against Zizou Bergs on hard. Zizou Bergs comes in at 6 wins from the last ten. Jesper De Jong is 3-7 across recent matches.
There's a wide gap in our ratings on hard, and our number follows from it. Jong comes in off a compressed schedule; Bergs comes in off a compressed schedule. The edge belongs to Bergs — real, but not the kind you take for granted at this level.
✗ Pick wrongWe got this one wrong. Our final number was 64% on Alex De Minaur; Botic Van De Zandschulp won 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Pick: Minaur
Win probability: 64% Minaur · Market: -256 · We call it in 4+ sets (60%) · single likeliest score 3-0 (30%)
A spot in the next round is at stake on Thursday, when Alex De Minaur goes up against Botic Van De Zandschulp in the US Open round of 64. Alex De Minaur has won 6 of the last 10. Botic Van De Zandschulp is 7-3 across recent matches.
There's a wide gap in our ratings on hard, and our number follows from it. Minaur comes in off a compressed schedule. Minaur should have enough here, though Zandschulp has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.
✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Arthur Gea was our 64% pick, and won 5-7 6-3 6-2 6-2.
Pick: GeaUpset call
Upset call: the market makes Svajda the favorite; our numbers say Gea.
Win probability: 64% Gea · Market: +121 · We call it in 4+ sets (73%) · single likeliest score 3-1 (26%)
Thursday's US Open round of 64 pits Arthur Gea against Zachary Svajda on hard. Arthur Gea brings a 6-match winning streak into this one, 9-1 across the last ten. Zachary Svajda has won 4 of the last 10.
Arthur Gea simply rates much higher on hard, and our number follows from it. Svajda comes in off a compressed schedule. The edge belongs to Gea — real, but not the kind you take for granted at this level.
✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Michael Zheng at 55% before the match, and Michael Zheng won 6-3 2-6 6-2 6-3.
Pick: Zheng
Win probability: 55% Zheng · Market: -151 · We call it in 4+ sets (74%) · single likeliest score 3-1 (23%)
Thursday's US Open round of 64 pits Michael Zheng against Y. Bu on hard. Michael Zheng is 6-4 across recent matches. Y. Bu comes in at 6 wins from the last ten.
On paper it's close: comparable ratings, comparable serve numbers, small margins everywhere. Zheng comes in off a compressed schedule; Bu comes in off a compressed schedule. A tiebreak or two would surprise nobody, with Zheng fractionally more likely to land the big points.
✗ Pick wrongMissed it. We had Ignacio Buse at 52%, but Benjamin Bonzi won 6-2 7-6 6-0.
Pick: Buse
Win probability: 52% Buse · Market: -107 · We call it in 4+ sets (75%) · single likeliest score 3-1 (21%)
A spot in the next round is at stake on Thursday, when Benjamin Bonzi goes up against Ignacio Buse in the US Open round of 64. Ignacio Buse brings a 6-match winning streak into this one, 7-3 across the last ten. Benjamin Bonzi comes in at 6 wins from the last ten.
On paper it's close: comparable ratings, comparable serve numbers, small margins everywhere. Buse comes in off a compressed schedule. A tiebreak or two would surprise nobody, with Buse fractionally more likely to land the big points.