Maiden.bet

Guadalajara & Sao Paulo predictions, September 18, 2026: Bucsa vs. Jovic, Stearns vs. Stephens

By The Maiden Desk · September 18, 2026

Every number below was fixed before the match and graded against the official result.

Share card

5 matches are on Friday's card at Guadalajara and Sao Paulo, and we have a pick for every one of them. The headline act: Cristina Bucsa against Iva Jovic in the semifinal. Our calls: Jovic over Bucsa, Stearns over Stephens, Blinkova over Charaeva, Kostovic over Quevedo, Podoroska over Lamens.

September 17, 2026 results: 5-9 how our picks graded, match by match.

Cristina Bucsa vs. Iva Jovic

✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Iva Jovic at 66% before the match, and Iva Jovic won 6-4 6-1.

Pick: Jovic

Win probability: 66% Jovic · Market: -292 · Sets: 2 (66%) · most likely score 2-0 (45%)

Friday's Guadalajara semifinal pits Cristina Bucsa against Iva Jovic on hard. Iva Jovic comes in at 7 wins from the last ten. Cristina Bucsa is rolling — 3 straight wins, 7 of 10 in recent play.

Hold strength tells the story — 62.7% versus 58.6% on first-serve points in Jovic's favor. Jovic should have enough here, though Bucsa has the tools to make the scoreboard uncomfortable.

Peyton Stearns vs. Sloane Stephens

✓ Pick rightNailed it. We had Peyton Stearns at 57% before the match, and Peyton Stearns won 7-6(6) 6-4.

Pick: Stearns

Win probability: 57% Stearns · Market: -159 · Sets: 2 (63%) · most likely score 2-0 (37%)

Friday's Guadalajara quarterfinal pits Peyton Stearns against Sloane Stephens on hard. Peyton Stearns is 5-5 across recent matches. Sloane Stephens comes in at 5 wins from the last ten.

There's a wide gap in our ratings on hard, and our number follows from it. Little separates them; Stearns gets the nod on the finest of margins.

Alina Charaeva vs. Anna Blinkova

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Anna Blinkova was our 55% pick, and won 6-4 7-5.

Pick: Blinkova

Win probability: 55% Blinkova · Market: -143 · Sets: 2 (58%) · most likely score 2-0 (33%)

Alina Charaeva and Anna Blinkova meet in the quarterfinal at Sao Paulo on Friday. Anna Blinkova has won 6 of the last 10. Alina Charaeva is 5-5 across recent matches.

Anna Blinkova is clearly higher-rated on hard — our number puts Blinkova around 55%. Little separates them; Blinkova gets the nod on the finest of margins.

Kaitlin Quevedo vs. Teodora Kostovic

✗ Pick wrongMissed it. We had Teodora Kostovic at 52%, but Kaitlin Quevedo won 6-3 6-4.

Pick: Kostovic

Win probability: 52% Kostovic · Market: +129 · Sets: 3 (43%) · most likely score 2-0 (30%)

A spot in the next round is at stake on Friday, when Kaitlin Quevedo goes up against Teodora Kostovic in the Sao Paulo quarterfinal. Teodora Kostovic has won 4 of the last 10. Kaitlin Quevedo comes in at 4 wins from the last ten.

Kostovic's 63.8% behind the first serve (against 60.7% for Quevedo) means break chances should be scarce in one direction. Quevedo comes in off a compressed schedule. This one is close to a coin flip, and the lean toward Kostovic is exactly that — a lean.

Nadia Podoroska vs. Suzan Lamens

✓ Pick rightWe got this one right. Nadia Podoroska was our 59% pick, and won 7-6 3-6 6-3.

Pick: Podoroska

Win probability: 59% Podoroska · Market: -108 · Sets: 2 (62%) · most likely score 2-0 (37%)

A spot in the next round is at stake on Friday, when Nadia Podoroska goes up against Suzan Lamens in the Sao Paulo quarterfinal. Nadia Podoroska has won 4 of the last 10. Suzan Lamens is 5-5 across recent matches.

Nadia Podoroska is clearly higher-rated on hard — our number puts Podoroska around 59%. A tiebreak or two would surprise nobody, with Podoroska fractionally more likely to land the big points.

Get the free ebook + tomorrow's picks

Sign up for the daily desk email and our nine-chapter beginner's guide to trading sports prediction markets comes free as a PDF. One email a day with the day's free picks in full, unsubscribe anytime.

Updated Sep 17, 2026, 12:30 AM UTC. Picks are frozen before first serve and graded on the track record page — this page is never edited after the fact.

Also on this day's slate